Science vs. Religion Essay -- Religious Science Creationism Essays

Science vs. Religion Since the dawn of man, manhood have striven to explain the many an(prenominal) mysteries of the universe, and to justify our existence in it. passim this journey of self-understanding, numerous stand geological periods on human existence have evolved and integrate into a complex, abstract manifestation called religion. However, as the human race has self-aggrandizing and advanced itself, many ideas expressed by religion seem less(prenominal) and less plausible. Advances in science and technology have yielded a refreshful breed of human thought that has disturbed and shaken the foundations of religious ideology. Our new, scientifically grounded understanding of the universe has unfolded a plethora of answers to come on-old questions, which are antithetical to the explanations offered by religion. As strong scientific evidence has surfaced which is contrary to the habitual religious view, open-minded believers have adapted their beliefs accordingly, but many fundamentalists wane to accept scientific evidence. This is the root of the dilemma in the midst of science and religion. many an(prenominal) philosophers and theists have offered their views concerning the ongoing battle between science and religion. Reconciliation between science and religion is impossible, because the claims made by religion and the evidence provided by science are so extraordinarily different. The advance of science has caused many theists to compromise traditional religious beliefs in order to facilitate scientific evidence, thus proving that scientific explanations of the universe are more plausible than the rationales offered by religion. An excellent example of this after part be seen in the question of the age of the planet flat coat. According to religious theology, the Earth is less than ten grand piano years old. However, there is an overwhelming amount of scientific evidence that proves the Earth to be many billions of years old. Many r eligious thinkers have responded to this evidence, by claiming that the methods used to ascertain the Earths age are inexact. They argue that radioactive go out a widely accepted method of determining the age of rocks, is inaccurate because there is no available rock sample of a cognise age, which the method can be calibrated to. However, this argument is obsolete, because the only calibration required to find the age of a rock is the measurement of disintegrate rates, which can be found in the laboratory in... ...ith. Many theists point out that certain aspects of nature are also invisible, such as gravitational fields and magnetic fields (Foster 60). However, a parallel cannot be drawn between the invisibility of these natural phenomenons and the invisibility of god, because these aspects of nature can be measured. God, on the other hand, cannot be proven to exist finished empirical evidence. If scientific evidence exists that refutes the teachings of the bible, then why do multitude believe in religion? Religion gives humanity a horse sense of security, a sense of individual purpose, and well-nigh importantly, brings people together. Arguably the most important aspects of any valid religion is its belief in a code of conduct, a set of moral teachings that define how people should channel towards others. Religion is one of the major ways one generation passes on its values and morals to each succeeding generation. Religion has also been viewed as a way to control the masses. According to Karl Marx, Religion is the opium of the people (Microsoft Bookshelf compact disc read-only memory 1998). Despite the scientific arguments that challenge the teachings of religion, religion will always take a breather an institution in our society.