Kishwar Naheed Essay

She conveys that wo hands were unwanted and were non c atomic number 18d for. In particular female infants were seen as a financial burden to an Indian family as they were discriminated from operative and were non allowed to turn over an education. Naheed emphasises that she entangle as if she was in the family for no purpose. Male infants were seen as the family gaining prosperity, they were famous and it was a gift to be proud of. The opening of the stanza Brash with scratch immediately tells the reviewer that this is a luxurious place or arrogant. The newsworthiness Brash is ironic as it can pie-eyed white faced.The pungent vowel of the assonance helps the reader to suggest the poets anger. The simile and alliteration of the phrase flaring like a flag conveys the idea that the eatery asserts itself, even in its name. The word flag suggests that the people who set up a flag, kick in conquered someone elses disembark. This highlights the idea of when the whites stole the land of South Africa. Flaring suggests that the whites are bragging to the lower classes (blacks) about their high-performance lifestyle and it conveys Afrikas anger as this links to the image of mania calld earlier in stanza two anger of my eyes. The simile care at the gatepost suggest that the restaurant is reserved exclusively for white people. The guards are threatening the peck (blacks. ) He explains that even though on that point is No sign displayed outside the whites only inn and Apartheid was supposed to be get to an end. The guard is replaced instead of the sign as they block the masses (blacks) from launching the haute cuisine. Therefore, Afrika gives a clear image to the reader that Apartheid still exists.In I am not that char Kishawar Naheed attempts to define the man-woman relationship and address the mail she faces in her everyday life of exploitation and oppression. It is illustrated in the run-in outright it is time for me to flower free. The allit eration gives the impression that she wants to fight back and does not want to live restricted whateverto a greater extent. The speech communication Now and free shows when she wants to redefine the man-woman relationship. Moreover, she explains how she wants to live like. Naheed wants a life with no restrictions and for men and women to be hardened equally.The message in the poem is that men and women are not ever treated equally and how there is still sexism and discrimination. In particular, women are not dominated by men and men are treated with prestige and power. The poem helps her express her thoughts and whimsys. Afrikas linguistic process are ambiguous we come where we belong. This perhaps emphasises that the masses (blacks) know that they are discriminated from entering the inn as there is a guard at the gate post. The use of the pronoun we emphasises that he banks that his identity belongs with the masses (blacks.) The star rose on each go steady board contr ast with the working mans cafe. As a single rose symbolises high quality lifestyle or perfection. It could also mean the arrogant wealth that was amongst the mass poverty at the time. In the delivery My motherhood Naheed conveys that women were born to nurture and care. On the other hand, the men in her familiarity have stolen this substantial and amazing gift from them. Instead women are forced to be voiceless, obedient and were unfairly treated as servants ascribable to the male dominance. My loyalty suggests that her husband and her father took a behavior her loyalty and treated her unfairly.Naheed is aware that she has the right to achieve her loyalty again. In the fifth stanza the poet uses the words bunny chows to convey the masses (blacks) poor lifestyle in the working mans cafe. Bunny chows was cheap at the time and a common local snack of a poor mans hamburger it is a stark contrast with haute cuisine. In the restaurant there are plastic tables top, this suggests the poor lifestyle the masses had. The plastic tables top suggests that there is no tablecloth and they felt incomplete, empty and it must have been uncomfortable to eat on.Wipe your fingers on your jeans gives the impression that there is nowhere to wash ones workforce after eating or a tissue to wipe hands. Afrika uses exact imagery to show the life of the masses (blacks. ) Kishwar suggests that women do not have self respect. This is evident in The woman on the poster half(prenominal) naked. Naheed is commenting on how men look at women as objects or for sexual pleasure. She wants this view to compound. The tone No, no I am not that woman emphasises that Naheed is not a woman who is obedient, subservient and does not want to avoid any arguments or disagreements with anything the men verbalize.The repetition of no shows that she is certain on her works and strongly disagrees with how many women in the Asiatic culture are living. Afrika uses the words boy again to show that the appearance of District six brings back memories of his childhood when the Apartheid system existed. He does not feel independent as he feels like a boy and believes he is following the whites like how a child is with their parents. Hands burn emphasises his anger against the system and his urge to crush the symbol of segregation. Afrika repeats the title Nothings changed at the ending of the poem.He conveys that even though Apartheid has been Abolished, the masses (blacks) are still treated inferior. The last-place stanza shows his anger and disappointment of the economic division between the whites and the masses (blacks) and conveys that the society has not changed at all. The layout of Nothings changed is set out in eight short lines in each of the six stanzas. The layout creates a wiz of control as he is clear on what he is feeling and no sudden rage is introduced at any point in the poem. His anger increases gradually within each line.The poet makes his argument straigh t forwards by emphasising his feelings in a calm manner. In the first stanza the use of imagery makes the reader feel as if they are in the poets shoes. This makes it clear and easy to hazard how life was like for Tatumkhulu Afrika. This is illustrated in the words Small round hard stones click under my heels. It makes it easy to imagine the masses (blacks) unpleasant and unfortunate lifestyle. The structure of I am not that woman is informal. The layout of the stanzas do not fit in a prescribed pattern and none of the words rhyme with each other.The free satiny structure shows how determined Naheed is about her argument. This conveys that nothing can change the way she is and nothing will hold her back. Even by the simple rules of poetry. It emphasises how monstrous she is towards emancipation. Furthermore, she is protesting about women having access to equal opportunities and rights as men and women should not be treated as if they are worthless or disempowered. It is seen in the words my loyalty. The tones between Nothings changed and I am not that woman are very different. Kishwar Naheeds tone in I am not that woman is very calm, but firm.Her steady tone conveys that she has control over what is being said by repeatedly claiming I not that woman. Tatumkhulu Afrikas tone contrasts compared to Naheeds. In Nothings changed the poet seems to be change magnitude his rage within each line as he sees more things that have not changed even though Apartheid was abolished. Moreover, he is feeling outraged because he had not been to District six for many years. In-conclusion, I believe that Kishwar Naheed in I am not that woman argument is stronger as the poem relates more to her lifestyle, cultural beliefs and traditional values about what she has experient as a woman herself.Naheed clearly explains that wants equality between men and women. Moreover, she does not want to live a typical lifestyle of an Asian and leaves the reader in hope that there is a chance of change. yet I believe that Tatumkhulu Afrika argument in Nothings changed. Is not as strong as Naheeds as he leaves the reader feeling helpless and has not attempted to change his lifestyle as much as Naheed has in nothings changed. Afrika has allowed the whites to treat the masses (blacks) unfairly because he was not as determined or zealous as Naheed.He mainly just agreed how nothings changed however, Naheed believes that no one can stop or change her views. This is why I strongly believe Naheedss argument is more effective. I believe that Naheeds argument will become more tendinous if the majority of women did not accept the cultural beliefs of a submissive Asian housewife and they were all determined to fight for equality. By women taking action as a group by giving their views and speaking the men may realise that women are treated unfairly, and their lifestyle may change once they have taken action.