Descartes’ Cogito Essay -- Philosophy small universal elements

Descartes Cogito It is the purpose of this essay to hit the books two Descartes Cogito argument and his skepticism towards piddling and universal elements, as surface as the imports these arguments have on each other. First, I pull up stakes summate and explain the skepticism Descartes brings to bear on small and universal elements in his first meditation. Second, I go out summarize and explain the Cogito argument, Descartes famous I think, at that placefore I am (it should be noted that this famous implication is not actually something ever said or written by Descartes, nevertheless instead, an implication taken from his argument for his own existence). Third, I will critique the line of reasoning underlying these arguments. Descartes attacks small and universal elements with the job posed by the calamity of God being an omnipotent deceiver, but he seems to think his Cogito argument is immune from this type of criticism. Fourth, I will show how the Cogito is actually harder to establish than the existence of small and universal elements. And, fifth, I will establish small and universal elements as an Archimedean point (i.e. a foundational claim). In Descartes first meditation, paragraphs 9-12, he arrives at the final and most annihilative stage of questioning his beliefs. In his first two stages, he questions both small and distant objects and medium sized objects, and concludes that neither can be held as true with any certainty. He throws out the first because of the supposition that the small and distant object is a mirage, and throws out the second because of the possibility that we are actually dreaming while perceiving medium sized objects. In his third and final stage of doubt, Descartes examines sma... ...things. The lack of an omnipotent deceiver and the frankness of the existence of small and universal elements lead to an even broader foundational claim there is a world where the small and universal el ements exist. Either it is the world or so us at his very moment, or, if this is a dream, it is the world of the dreamer whose small and universal elements make up this dream world. In concluding, a some things must be noted. One, Descartes omnipotent deceiver does not and cannot exist in the manner Descartes relates. Two, even if the deceiver did exist, the Cogito would not be immune from the go bad of doubt the deceivers existence would cause to fall on reality. Three, even without the deceiver, the Cogito is falsifiable because of the Someone Elses Dream argument. Four, there is a world where small and universal elements we know of exist.