Leader case study on Steve Jobs Essay

Question 1EXPLAIN HOW EACH OF THE FIVE ELEMENTS OF OUR ex gravel OF LEADERSHIP APPLIES TO STEVE JOBS LEADING APPLE?As defined by Mr. Achua leadershiphip is the influencing process of leaders and followers to achieve cheekal objectives through qualifying. He defined impressive leader to be slightly ace who project the five-spot cistrons of leadership as mentioned in the above figure. Mr. Steve Jobs has been a cheeseparing cause of world an effective leader for apple. The five elements in his soulality atomic number 18 discussed as follows_INFLUENCE_Influencing is the process of a leader communicating ideas, gaining acceptance of them, and do followers to support and implement the ideas through change. Mr. Jobs has been a perfect model for this element. He has influence not only his employees as sanitary as his customers by consumeing innovative results that his customers want. t eithery to the case the heap who unexpended apple says though Jobs hogs the cre dit but theyve never through with(p) conk out work. This is how influenced his people from him. They were loyal and gave Mr. Jobs heavy(p) respect._ORGANIZATIONAL OBJECTIVES_Effective leaders influence followers to think not only of their own pursuals but excessively of the interest of the organization through a shared visual sense. Mr. Jobs didnt think nigh his own interests while work in Apple, the example of him hiring John Scuelly to bring original management into power in place of himself is a prove, that he wanted his community to grow. It was his vision that make the companies he worked for a success._CHANGE_ in that location is no doubt if it is said that change was the most important element that Mr. Steve had for be an effective leader. Apple has been a perfect example of change and it was only possible because of Mr. Jobs. Discussing the communitys think antithetic denote campaign, Isaacson writes, They debated the grammatical issue If different was supposed to modify the verb think, it should be an adverb, as in think differently. still Jobs insisted that he wanted different to be employ as a noun, as in think supremacy or think beauty. This shows that he always wanted to be different and unique. Bill Gates also said that Jobs did things differently and its sorcerous. According to the case Jobs wanted to bring about change, took innovative risk.1 http//www. impertinentlyyorker.com/online/blogs/comment/2012/10/apple- by and by-steve-jobs.html_PEOPLE_Leadership is about leading people. As per the case Jobs had been a contentious figure in business. People who have worked for Jobs over the old age have mixed reactions to his leading people. Some call him temperamental, aggressive, tough, intimidating, and genuinely demanding. He has been cognize to verbally attack people who make mistakes and are not shock goals and expectations. Yet, employees who perform up to expectation are s swell up rewarded. Even some(prenominal) who f eared him also had great respect for him as he did inspire loyalty, rapture, and amply levels of performance through continuous innovation. Even people who left Apple say its often brutal and Jobs hogs the credit, but theyve never through with(p) better work. Hence they intend to follow him._LEADER FOLLOWERS_An effective leader ineluctably to share his ideas and listen to others and implement their ideas to be effective. It is due to Mr. Jobs good breeding that Apple is still working well. When Mr. Job was sick back in 2004 and 2009, Mr. Tim Cook (present chief executive officer of Apple) was given his position and through Mr. Jobs guidance he ran the company. He made his follower the next leader and trained him well for the job. According to the case while working with the build team, he apply to take input from the followers into what is designed and how. Mr. Jobs always inspired loyalty, enthusiasm and high levels of performance through continuous innovation from his followers. forefront 2IDENTIFY LEADERSHIP typeS PLAYED BY JOBS AS chief operating officer OF APPLE. WHICH ROLE WAS THE MOST IMPORTANT?Figure 1 Leadership Managerial Roles by Henry MintzbergThe traits of all managerial roles defined by Mintzberg can been seen in Mr. Jobs organism the leader of Apple. But the most important role that he played was being an entrepreneur that comes under closingal role. Following are the roles that he played while leading Apple_FIGURE HEAD_Mr. Jobs performed the figurehead role for Apple when he used to represent the organization. He used to make resolution for the build of products, interacted with the customers. Signing functionary documents, entertaining clients or customers as official representatives. He used to give live interviews. He also used to informally talk to people and attend away meetings as an organizational representative._LEADER_Mr. Jobs played the leader role that is of performing the management functions to effectively fly th e coop the managers organization unit. According to the case he made decision for hiring professional management. He used to do coaching and give instructions to design department specifically. He used to confront people if the performance of employees falls but also used to reward them if they performed well._MONITOR_Mr. Jobs performed the monitor role when he used to gather information for innovative products, to discover problems and opportunities, and to understand events outside the organizational unit. He was a flawlessnessist. He used to monitor e verything very closely. According to the case he was obsessive CEO who wanted his product to be practically perfect in every way. He was the one who stop the launch of one of Apple right before the launch date to be sure its perfect._DISSEMINATOR_Steve also played a disseminator role when he used to work with the design team. When some information needed to be transferred to the employees. When Mr. Cook become active CEO in 20 09, Steve used to make decisions and convey them to him to bring it into action._SPOKESPERSON_Mr. Steve was a great spokesperson for Apple. He used to interact with people outside organization through seminars, meetings and interviews. The reason why people know him really well is, he used to speak to the public on behalf of Apple._ENTREPRENEUR_Steve Jobs is one of the beat out entrepreneurs. Through self-assessment he realized that his strengths was in developing impudently products. He believed the future of Apple depends on the frequent product introduction and transition. His vision for Apple made him a great entrepreneur. Bill Gates also called him to be visionary with intuitive taste. He does thing differently and it was magical in the eye of Bill Gates._DISTURBANCE HANDLER_Steve performed the derangement-handler role of leadership when he took corrective action when the company was about to get bankrupt. According to the case Jobs save the company in a way that is not se en in the register of Silicon Valley. Hence it proves him being a disturbance handler._RESOURCE ALLOCATOR_Steve was also a alternative allocator when he used to appoint people in teams and to work they were good at. He allocated Sculley to be the CEO is an e.g of resource allocator._NEGOTIATOR_He was a great negotiator. He used to make people allure about his ideas. People were so influenced by him that they said none of them has done better work than him. One of the reason was he was a good negotiator.QUESTION 3WHICH LEVEL OF ANALYSIS IS THE PRIMARY FOCUS OF THIS oddball?The old focus of the case is to have an analysis of oneself i.e self-assessment. Discovering what a person is good at can make him reach high targets of life. As Steve Jobs did his self-assessment and did it right he knew he was good at making new and innovative products, so he focused all his attention in doing this job which made him succeed. Doing the job you enjoy and are good at is the key for career deve lopment and reaching the top of success ladder. He had a clear vision in his mind for himself and Apple which made him a great leader. So doing self-assessment and having a clear vision is the primary focus of this case.QUESTION 4EXPLAIN HOW EACH OF THE LEADERSHIP speculation CLASSIFICATION APPLIES TO THIS CASE, AND WHICH ONE IS THE MOST RELEVANT?A leadership system is an explanation of some formulation of leadership theories have practical lever because they are used to better understand, predict, and control successful leadership. Leadership supposition classifications include trait, behavioral, contingency, and integrative. Following is the explanation how all these apply to the case_LEADERSHIP TRAIT_ theories hear to justify distinctive characteristics accounting for leadership effectiveness. Researchers analyzed physical and mental traits, or qualities, such as high energy level, appearance, aggressiveness, self-reliance, persuasiveness, and dominance in an effort to id entify a set of traits that all successful leaders possessed. According to the case Steve Jobs was also a person he was aggressive, very demanding, tough and intimidating. He always showed high level of energy._BEHAVIORAL LEADERSHIP_ theories attempt to explain distinctive styles used by effective leaders, or to define the character of their work.Mintzbergs ten managerial roles are an example of behavioral leadership theory. This theory applies in the case by discussing different examples that showed Steve Jobs to be an effective leader. As discussed in the question 2, Steve had showed almost all the managerial roles of being an effective leader when required. He had been an entrepreneur by introducing innovative products. He has been a spokesperson and a figure head for Apple. A resource allocator when he gave the CEO position to Sculley. A leader when he had to launch new products in a perfect way. A disturbance handler when he retrieve Apple back to the place that it merited an d so on._CONTINGENCY LEADERSHIP_ theories attempt to explain the appropriate leadership style found on the leader, followers, and situation. In other words, which traits and/or behaviors will result in leadership success given the situational variables. Again Steve Jobs example has been used in this case to explain the contingency leadership. When he changed the culture back to entrepreneurial atmosphere. He was the man who had clear vision and understood the requirement of fourth dimension and worked accordingly. Another example that the case discuss is when he launch Pixar when working with NeXt._INTEGRATIVE LEADERSHIP_ theories attempt to combine the trait, behavioral, and contingency theories to explain successful, influencing leader-follower relationships. Researchers try to explain why the followers of some leaders are willing to work so hard and make personal sacrifices to achieve the group and organizational objectives, or how effective leaders influence the behavior o f their followers. In this case it is seen when people though were not given credit of work yet followed Steve and blaspheme him blindly. He made his followers grow and they were loyal to him.After discussing all the theories, I believe that the most relevant theories to this case and Steve Jobs is _Integrative leadership_. The reason being that it contains all the rest of theories including leader follower relationship that can be seen in Steve Jobs. The case mainly highlight _Trait and Behavioral leadership theories_ aspect in Steve Jobs personality however if he is studied in token the Integrative leadership theories can be best applied to him.QUESTION 5WHEN STEVE JOBS LEAVES APPLE AGAIN, WILL APPLES PERFORMANCE omit AND GO BACK INTO A CRISIS OF NEAR BANKRUPTCY? WHY OR WHY NOT?As everyone knows that Steve Jobs expired in Oct 2011, it has been 2 years that Apple is performing under Mr. Tim Cook leadership. According to the present position of Apple in the world being the best company, it can be said that Apple performance has reminded the same. One of the reason could be Steve being a great leader trained his followers so well that it help the present management to sustain Apple position in market. Mr. Tim had been the CEO for Apple when Steve was sick and on leave. He made decision on behalf of Steve under Steve observation.So he has been trained to be the CEO and hence replaced Steve in a good way. However it wont be wrong to say that the punch of innovation and bring new products in the market is missing be the company has introduced improved versions of the products that Steve Jobs introduced. As people are so hooked up with Apple products it helps the company to sustain its position. But if the company doesnt introduce something new concisely its performance can be effected. As Apple is known for its innovation.The company recently launch Apple Map App but it was a failure. The perfection element that Steve products used to have was missing in it and Google maps were much better. But if we talk about financial performance then yes it has improved after Steve Jobs as well.